DoctorDavid Monger

My research focuses on propaganda and patriotism in First World War Britain. My first book examined domestic propaganda in Britain from 1917 aimed at maintaining civilian morale. It focused on the ways propagandists interpreted patriotism. Patriotism was a 'purposive language' used to persuade others of the validity or necessity of an action. Understanding this shows the significance of different themes within wider discussion, and highlights less heavily-discussed, but more rhetorically crucial, elements of narratives. Alongside the book, I have published several articles on related themes and topics, addressing propaganda content towards soldiers and women; the significance of performed rituals and participation in public propaganda; the importance of making patriotic acts tangible and achievable for civilians; the ways in which 'expert' knowledge of Germany created over-simplified analysis of German propaganda and ideas; and a re-evaluation of wartime censorship.

My most recent book is an ‘A to Z’ of British First World War propaganda, published by Bloomsbury in 2025. Propaganda remains a thoroughly misunderstood area of First World War history. The book offers an introductory overview of propaganda’s operations and themes that helps non-specialists to understand the topic more clearly. The book brings together the latest scholarship on the topic with extensive examples of original propaganda materials and discussion of under-explored elements of Britain's propaganda efforts.

I have also explored connections between British propaganda and the Armenian Genocide. My article on the subject discussed the transnational network of humanitarian activists who collaborated on a parliamentary report on the Genocide, arguing for the importance of mutually reinforcing actions by different participants and suggesting the event was a point of transition of presumed leadership of the 'civilised' world from Britain to the United States. The extent of this transition is an area of growing research interest for me, with a recent article considering a British charitable work in support of Belgium as an example of Britain appealing to 'world opinion', and particularly to the US, in partial recognition that Britain was not strong enough to direct world affairs alone.